Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-35230176-20180802192858/@comment-26180030-20180803184152

Soel404 wrote: Crabwhale wrote: No offense to any of you guys, but if your reasons are so, well, petty, for lack of a better term, then I don't think any of you should be admins. An admin should have the Wiki's legitimately best interests at heart, like Max does, while your reasons boil down to "I want to able to do stuff without having to ask for it".

Which is a fair complaint, and again, I don't mean to be insulting to any of you, but I know that if I was a bureaucrat I would look for a bit more than that if I wanted to appoint someone. Well what else would I do, police the other users into conforming to my image of what the Wiki should be? cause that sounds like a kinda dickish thing to do, but I would also help other users if they asked,for instance, if someone needed a Thread closed or a page locked, or deleted (Provided it was their page), I don't really see what the other Admins are doing to change the Wiki No, I didn't mean becoming Shitler in the process, but still, I wouldn't venture to say that the current state of the admins (being almost entirely inactive except when asked or if it's Rodri) is much better.