Board Thread:Concerns/@comment-29087440-20180512161538/@comment-27328974-20180514153230

I just read through this, and I want to state my opinion, and then an idea.

First of all, I'm not very active in this wiki, and any edits that I make tend to be technical, so I don't know first-hand how problematic these pages are. But, that doesn't mean that I haven't found these types of pages while roaming around the wiki; I just deem any absurdly long and/or spammy pages an annoyance, and I ignore them (Unless they have those autoplaying recordings. I really hate those profiles).

Second, I have to agree with Ryukama: I might hate those pages, but I don't want to take them down just because I dislike them. This wiki has been very lenient on what is allowed in this wiki, and I don't want to suddenly take that away from the people.

Lastly, an idea; other wikis (such as Wikipedia) have a "Good Article" or "Featured Article" system that promotes articles identified by the community to be articles of high quality, informative, et cetera. I think we should implement that system to identify good and/or entertaining articles, possibly following some guideline, and separate them from the more spammy and/or lower quality profiles, so people don't have to go through a horde of mediocre profiles to find a good profile or a profile that they'll like.

Tell me what you guys think.