Thread:KingPin0422/@comment-5935499-20181027033512/@comment-35244094-20181027044227

Alexcar3000 wrote: Omnipotence is a fancy title given to those at the top of the food chain. Tier 0 and Tier High 1-A must be removed due to the requeriments of being those two tiers being subjective, unquantifiable and useless in the long term. There isn't a clear way to define what's a 0 or 1-A as it changes depending on the verse, one can be "Omnipotent" by being superior to one 1-A or an endless amount of it.

If you put someone who is Low 2-C in a verse filled with 10-Bs, they would be Omnipotent because they can do virtually anything. TOAA can do virtually anything for low-level 1-A's. Which isn't saying much when you compare it to, say, Umineko or I/O. Omnipotence cannot be proven logically. The "ability to do everything" depends on the "amount of things" inside a verse. In fact, a paradox similar to "make a rock so heavy one can't lift" in the "ability to do anything" would include the "ability to NOT be Omnipotent", which is a logical contradiction. This is what paraconsistent logic talks about. Omnipotent beings, in order to be Omnipotent, must be able to NOT be Omnipotent, otherwise they can't do everything, and thus, are not Omnipotent.

And it's because power is subjective, such as TOAA's level, or the definition of "Omnipotence" itself, as it got changed many times already; From the "ability to do anything" to the "ability to do anything logically possible" to "anything that doesn't contradict one's own nature" and so on. Omnipotence is a term that is in constant change, always being questioned. So saying God can make a rock heavier than him and he cannot lift it no matter what makes him Omnipotent but God making a rock heavier than him but can lift it is not omnipotent? Is that your point?