Thread:Seol404/@comment-27258569-20190129063801/@comment-35000429-20190207231631

Ryukama wrote: The vast majority of most reviews are going to boil down to opinions and why the reviewers in question don't like the stories themselves. The closest to "objective flaws" are continuity inconsistencies and tecnological errors. But either way you like well made reviews that do a good job explaining why something is bad (even if you want to claim the reasons they're bad are "objective") you still like well made reviews that explain the reasons why something is bad. So I don't know why it's so unfathomable to you that someone likes a well made reviews that do a good job explaining why something is good. That's exactly what the reviews are about, they don't try to write the story for the writers by overthinking the plot in an effort to make something more complex than what was actually there.

The reasons I may not like the things may not be objective, but the things are objectively bad. I like hearing people talk about the actual stuff that is really there, not the stuff they didn't like (And yes, it can be fun to hear somebody rant for a while, but I like substance)