Thread:Seol404/@comment-27258569-20190129063801/@comment-27258569-20190207234216

Do they not bring their own opinions as to why they don't like these things? Or is it just some bullet point list of continuity inconsistencies and technological errors? I've watched some of the videos and while I agree these suck it's hard to argue most of the things are "objective facts". Also you're literally judging a review that you've admitted to not reading yet are saying "how little I know about this subject".

Anyways I don't mind if you don't agree with the blog or the things it brings up. What I don't like is that you're judging the very concept of enjoying a review/analysis that explains what they find good about something and judging me for liking it. While you constantly go on and on about how great E;R and MauLer are when they do the exact same shit.

They make reviews/analyses that explain what they find good (or in their more popular vids bad) about something. No matter how you try to insist that what they say is "objective", it's still the same thing. It's a review. In the review they describe things they find good/bad about what they're reviwing.

Sure you can not like or not agree with the review I brought up. But you're acting like the very concept of enjoying a review is foreign despite the fact that you enjoy reviews a lot.